**TWO
NOVAE, A VILLAGE AND SILBURY HILL**
__
Part One: the novae and the village__
For initial purposes I'll be using the following adaptation of the
excellent photograph that Frank Lauman has kindly made available:-
**
Fig. 1 **
Although my first view of this formation gave me the impression that it
wasn't manmade, I soon concluded that if I was going to analyse it I'd
be presented with a real challenge: it was devoid of certain features I
expect to find in a genuine circle. And when I roughly estimated its
displacement from the centre of Silbury Hill's summit I also found that
it didn't adhere to the pattern I'd identified in other formations this
year [explained in my preceding articles].
So I knew that if I was going to unravel the meaning of this field
edifice my knowledge and experience would be tested to the limit.
However, a stunning insight by a seasoned researcher in this area handed
me, in due course, the opening I'd been waiting for. …
Red Collie claimed that *Nova Delphini 2013* - found on August 14
at 18.00 UTC - was being alluded to in the formation* on August 13*
[the year's **225**^{th} day] and this excited me as soon as
I encountered it [weeks after it had been put online!]. He believed that
the necklace-like crop circle, which [as he demonstrated] resembled *
supernova 1987A* both visually and in a more scientific way, was
being linked to a different type of stellar explosion, a *nova*,
that was first observed, in the constellation of Delphinus, *just one
day after* the formation had been found. The relevant information is
summarised in the Fig. below, which includes an adaptation of Bertold
Zugelder's useful drawing, which I thank him for:-
**
Fig. 2 **
Although I now suspected that this theory holds the key to unlocking the
formation's mystery I was aware that two fundamental questions still
needed to be addressed. …
1] Why should pedantic crop circle builders have displayed, in our
fields, an image that's tied, in the indicated ways, to *a supernova*
*explosion* if they had wanted to highlight a stellar event that
represents a different and less intense stage of a star's lifecycle: *
Nova Delphini 2013*?
2] And why did those builders elect to create the circle, with its
unique form, *one day before* the cited *nova* would be first
observed on earth?
My attention was now drawn to the fact that the quoted isotope of
Titanium, which has a role in the *supernova process*, Titanium-**44**,
possesses an atomic nucleus that comprises a total of **22** protons
and **22** neutrons. I found this interesting, in the current
context, because although Red Collie didn't refer to it directly, the
formation is also made up of two distinct sets of **22**. To
demonstrate the point, I've repeated the aforementioned drawing below:-
**
Fig. 3 **
Although no-one could dispute that the formation comprises **22**
circles, the description isn't complete: each circular zone of flattened
crop merges with **2** hoop-like bands on its outside. So the whole
area of flattened crop is really a single, but fragmented, ring with one
sequence of **22** circular profiles on its inside and a bridging run
of **22** hoop-like profiles on its outside, as shown in the Fig.
below:-
**
Fig. 4 **
This reveals, then, that the formation could serve as a symbolic
representation of the *atomic nucleus* of Titanium-**44**, which
possesses an intimate group of **22** protons and **22**
neutrons.
This link between the crop circle and the isotope of Titanium that's
closely associated with supernovae was so impressive, in fact, that I
wondered if the depicted arrangement holds the answer to at least one of
the questions I was grappling with. I therefore had no hesitation in
investigating whether *prime numbers* could shed any light on the
subject. …
I labelled the circles and hoops, in Fig. 4, with the primes that *
correspond* to the numbers currently there [I again didn't show the
second set, to avoid *numerical congestion* in the Fig.] as
depicted below:-
[Note: the prime *corresponding* to 5 is **7** (= 5p); the prime
*corresponding* to 22 is **73** (= 22p)]
**
Fig. 5 **
The significance of this double occurrence of the first 22 prime numbers
wasn't apparent until after I'd determined their overall total … **1426**
[= 713+713].
Knowing that the formation had been first reported on day **225** of
the year and - **1** day later - on day **226**, *Nova Delphini
2013* was first detected, I now noted an extraordinary relationship
between these two events and the above arithmetic, and I've illustrated
it below. …
**
Fig. 6 **
In the Fig., the earlier cited fact is first repeated i.e. when **1**
is added to **225**, the day the crop circle was discovered, we
obtain **226**, the day that *Nova Delphini 2013* was
discovered.
But when **1** is similarly added to the other number we know is
closely linked to the formation - **1426** [the sum of the two sets
of 22 primes] - we obtain another factor that's unambiguously related to
the described **226**, the day of the nova's discovery i.e. the **
226**^{t}^{h} prime [= 1427].
So by adding **1** to each of the 2 factors we know the formation is
closely associated with, **225** [discovery day] & **1426**
[derived from its link to Titanium-44, which is active in *supernovae*],
respectively, we produce 2 numbers that are inextricably related to the
day of the year when *Nova Delphini 2013* was found: **226**
[the day itself] and the **226**^{t}^{h} prime
[1427].
Evidently, then, our recognition of the latter relationship between the
formation's structure, which relates in 2 independent ways to known
characteristics of *supernovae* explosions, and the discovery of
the *nova*, **1** day after the circle was found at Hackpen
Hill, provides us with an independent and important confirmation of Red
Collie's original assertion. The formation was predicting, **1** day
before the event, our discovery of *Nova Delphini 2013* on day **
226**! …
Knowing that there are some far reaching issues at stake here, I
concluded that the crop circle builders *must have been inviting us*
*to find this conundrum*, but I had no doubt that if that was the
case they'd have been obliged to provide us with at least one other
piece of information. They would have had to display, in the same field
edifice, a *prominent* manifestation of the cited **226**, so
we'd know that the number *does* have a pivotal role in their
communication, as I've suggested. And fortunately I didn't have to wait
very long to find one. …
On August 31, the year's **243**^{rd} day, marked changes to
the formation were discovered and I'll be focussing on the respective
details, and their implications, in the 2^{nd} part of this
article. One feature that needed little thought, however, was the fact
that the structure now comprised **7 **distinct circles of *
standing crop* [3 continuous & 4 fragmented] as shown in the Fig.
below, where I've adapted Zef Damon's drawing, which he has kindly
allowed me to use:-
**
Fig. 7 **
Because of my current commitments to other projects, I didn't know, for
some weeks, about this significant alteration to the formation. When I
finally encountered it, however, I realised immediately that it was
giving us even more than I'd expected. It happens to be the case that
the number **226** [expressed as
226/100] played a key role in two other areas of my research, one of
which relates to the distant past. And my studies had exposed a way of
generating it, using a simple algorithm that's based on a *prime*
our remote ancestors revered … **7**.
The algorithm can be conveniently described after we've placed the first
**7** primes, in order, onto the lower half [as displayed] of the **
7** circles in the above representation of the formation - starting
with **1** [= 1p] on the outer circle, and ending with **13** [=
7p], on the innermost, thus:-
**
Fig. 8 **
Each of the **7** circles now has 2 numbers sitting on it, as follows
[starting from the outside]:-
__
1 & 1__;
__2 & 2__; __3 & 3__; __4 & 5__; __5 & 7__; __6 & 11__;
__7 & 13__
The *products* of these 7 numerical pairs are 1, 4, 9, 20, 35, 66 &
91, and their sum is … **226**.
As far as I was concerned, then, the glaring modification of the
formation that was identified on August 31 represented, apart from
anything else, a bold statement that the number **226** did indeed
have a central role in the whole communication. And this conclusion
strongly supports the idea I described earlier concerning those who
built the Hackpen Hill circle [in its 2 stages] starting on the year's
**225**^{th} day. …
The ostensibly chance discovery, **1** day later, of *Nova Delphini
2013*, on the year's **226**^{th} day, must have been
carefully engineered by them, presumably as some form of sign to
humanity!
I was also interested to note that when the cited **1** and **226**
are juxtaposed they can infer **1226**, because this number can be
expressed as **2**x**613**, or, **2**px**113**p [i.e. the **
2**^{nd} prime x the **113**^{th}].
And the product of the inferred **2** and **113** yields another
manifestation of … **226**.
So having a time gap of **1** day, *before* day **226** - as
occurs in the described relationship - can represent, through the logic
of primes, a subtle way of highlighting the latter number, and I've
illustrated the relationship in the Fig. below:-
**
Fig. 9 **
Having found this elementary way of generating the described **226**,
from the inferred **1226**, its simplicity suggested that we'd been
*expected* to find it. I therefore pondered over it.
As it was evident that the **1226** can be expressed as the sum of
the highlighted **226** and **1000**, I now noted that the ratio
of these factors, 226/1000, represents a decimal expression, **.226**,
that's **1**/**10**^{th} of **2.26**, the number that
played the earlier cited key role in my former research.
Furthermore, as the act of viewing the **zero**-like circle, from the
**1** *nova* event, can generate a simple expression of the
number **10**, I knew that the product of this and the cited **.226**
yields the described **2.26** … but the process seemed too contrived
to constitute reliable evidence! [Note: clearly, for this hypothetical
situation, I am ignoring the fact that light from the crop circle would
actually take a very long time indeed to reach the *nova* (and *
vice versa*)]
It then came to my attention, however, that the same act of viewing,
from the **1** *nova* event [even weeks after it was found in
the sky] *the whole formation* with its **zero**-like first
circle and its later, **zero**-like form [ignoring the latter
circle's new internal details] can infer another simple expression, this
time of … **100**. And as the *nova* was closely linked to the
number **226** [the day it was discovered], as was the modified
formation [explained earlier], it was apparent that the whole
arrangement can infer the factor **2.26**, as depicted in the
symbolic Fig. below:-
Fig. 10
My recognition of this naïve but valid way of generating the factor **
2.26** interested me greatly [for reasons that will soon be clear] but
I had not the slightest doubt that, if we'd been invited to find it, the
arrangement involved would also embody some form of *tangible
confirmation*. I therefore set about looking for it in relationships
that exist between the dates that the *nova* and the two versions
of the formation were discovered: day **226**; and days **225** &
**243**. …
I knew that the time spans, in days, between the three dates, in order,
are *primes* i.e. between days 225 & 226 is **1** [= 1p], and
between days 226 & 243 is **17** [= 8p], and when I considered this
simple relationship further I realised that it embodies the means of
fabricating yet another manifestation of **2.26**. …
The juxtaposition of the cited 1 & 17 can infer **117** and this is
**100** more than **17**, which can be inferred by juxtaposing the
respective circle tallies in the two versions of the formation … **1**
[in the first] & **7** [in the second]. And by dividing the 226 by
this inferred 100, we produce, as we now, the cited **2.26**.
[Note: we have to exercise care when comparing numbers of 'circles' in
different formations or, in different internal arrangements of the same
formation. In this particular case, the first version of the formation
had a circle-like rim of *flattened crop* (comprising discs and
hoops) which encapsulated **1** circle (or circular arrangement)
comprising 22 'tufts' of *standing crop*. And in the second version
there were **7** circles (or circular arrangements) of *standing
crop*.]
I then expressed each date as the *corresponding prime* and checked
for relevant relationships between the two groups: the *nova*; and
the two versions of the formation. …
It soon transpired that the sum of the 225^{th} & 243^{rd}
primes, **2954** [= 1423+1531], exceeds the **226**^{th},
**1427**, by a number, **1527**, which can be expressed as … **
226**p + **100**.
In other words, I'd identified an intimate relationship, between the *
nova's* date of discovery, day **226**, and the dates of discovery
of the two versions of the formation, which embodies an inferred **226**
and **100** - knowing that the expression **226**/**100**
yields **2.26**.
I also noted that the primes that correspond to the cited formation
dates, **1423** and **1531**, each comprise digits of sum, **10**
[= 1+4+2+3 = 1+5+3+1], which can yield the factor **100** [= 10^{2}].
And when the *nova's* day of discovery, **226**, is divided by
this we produce another … **2.26**.
I've illustrated the respective relationships in the Fig. below:-
**
Fig. 11 **
I was now satisfied, then, that relationships between the *nova*
and the two versions of the crop circle that existed had been intended -
apart from anything else - to highlight the factor **2.26**, which
had had key roles in my earlier research. And as the number had now
surfaced in such subtle ways in this investigation, I decided that I
should shed light on those roles here. …
Every crop circle enthusiast will recall the massive formation that
appeared at Milk Hill, on the morning of August 12, 2001. Images of it
can still be seen in a variety of esoteric outlets, including the
internet, and to many people its majestic presence is as powerful today
as ever. But even its keenest admirers will not be aware that it
exhibited a set of simple but pertinent relationships with an event that
had happened more than fifteen hundred years earlier, in a city whose
magnificence and fame had once even eclipsed that of the formation:
Rome. …
The Milk Hill edifice comprised **410** circles [as I'll soon
explain] and in the year **410** AD the Visigoth, Alaric the Great,
sacked the once impregnable city, seizing what some people think was the
biggest treasure ever assembled. Unfortunately, however, only
unconfirmed rumours and claims describe what happened to this vast cache
of riches as the rampant army migrated to new territories, including an
area that's now part of southern France, Alaric having died in the
course of the arduous journey. But knowing that it's a well-worn tactic
of those who wish to keep the hiding place of a treasure *secret*
to promulgate false claims about its whereabouts, I - and many others -
considered the location of the hoard to be an open question.
To understand what I believe was Milk Hill's contribution to the next
part of the story we'll have to consider the following symbolic image,
which shows a view of the circle, looking south, with the central
meridian highlighted [I'd measured it as per the WGS 84 datum]:-
[Note: the whole formation was actually comprised of two structures: a
small, isolated 'ring' near the field's eastern fence-line (noted and
photographed, thankfully, by Peter Sorensen, but ignored by the majority
of other people); and the main edifice, with its celebrated **409**
circles. So the quota of circles in the whole formation was the
aforementioned **410**].
**
Fig. 12 **
If we now replace the main structure with the number that represents its
allotment of circles, **409**, we obtain an arrangement that bears an
obvious similarity to the decimal number **.409**, where the '**.**'
is being provided by the small ring that so many people thought was
irrelevant:-
**
Fig. 13 **
As the depicted meridian intersects the centre of the main structure
[now occupied by most of the inferred **.409**] it doesn't need a
leap of imagination to wonder if a meaningful relationship exists
between the numbers involved … **1.851** & **.409** … and their
sum happens to be: **2.26**.
We now believe, of course, that **2.26** was also being defined in a
Hackpen Hill formation of the year 2013. So two crop circles, whose
respective appearances were separated by a period of **12** years +
**1** day [from August 12, 2001, to, August 13, 2013] seem to have
been alluding *covertly* to the same 3-digit, decimal number.
Indeed, it isn't difficult to show that the quoted time span, expressed
in the indicated manner, is itself linked to the described factor, in a
way that can hardly be attributed to random chance, as illustrated in
the Fig. below:-
Fig. 14
I would add that even when the cited time span is expressed *in days*,
**4384** [= 365x12 + 3+1], it can be seen to relate to the current
subject matter in an illuminating way. … I've explained in earlier
articles on this site that, during my analyses of formations, I almost
invariably find expressions of the number **6371** [which represents,
in km, an up-to-date radius of the planet]. I was interested to
discover, then, that this pivotally important factor exceeds the cited
4384 by … **1987** … which we know is the number employed to define
the year that the *supernova* occurred, which the Hackpen Hill
circle [*Mark 1*] was depicting [as Red Collie first showed].
We'll now return to my analysis of the Milk Hill formation. …
If its cited manifestation of **2.26** is expressed in the same units
as the meridian, which made the biggest contribution to its value i.e.
degrees west, it defines another UK meridian and this one possesses an
intriguing property. In relation to the International Zero-Meridian,
through Greenwich, it's the *mirror image* of one that intersects
not just the region of France that the Germanic invaders had occupied,
after Alaric's death, but a former Visigothic citadel that has long been
linked to treasure claims, Rennes-le-Château, as shown in the symbolic
Fig. below. The enduring mystique surrounding this minuscule settlement
has, over the years, triggered a torrent of popular books, including Dan
Brown's best-selling novel *The Da Vinci Code*:-
**
Fig. 15 **
Furthermore, if we now return to the formation it isn't difficult to
recognise that another, extraordinary dimension can be added to the
depicted link to the French village, and the relationship we are then
confronted with raises a number of very far reaching questions. …
The one feature of the crop circle that most people observe when they
first see images of it is its **6** spokes [or the **6** *
segments* between them]. And even when the fact is considered that
the **1** massive structure is disposed alongside the **1**
diminutive ring, to its east, it's evident that the arrangement can be
considered to be a naïve depiction of the number **11**, which
happens to be the **6**^{th} prime. So no-one would dispute
that **6** is the edifice's dominant number.
But although it's evident that *at the macro level* the adjacent
assemblies depict the **6**^{th} prime, it's just as clear
that *at the micro level* the number **1409** can be seen, which
is the **224**^{th} prime, and this is interesting because
the edifice was found on the year's **224**^{th} day [August
12], as illustrated below:-
**
Fig. 16 **
However, as soon as it's acknowledged that the juxtaposition of the two
structures can depict the number **1409**, it has to be accepted that
the decimal number **1.409** could also be inferred.
Indeed, we recognised earlier that **.409** can be inferred by
juxtaposing the minuscule ring, '**.**' with the **409**; but it
would also be true to say that juxtaposing the term '**1 point**', or
'**1.**', with **409** can infer the cited **1.409**, as
illustrated below, where [for reasons that will soon be clear] I've
repeated the previously described link to the **6**^{t}^{h}
prime:-
**
Fig. 17 **
The shown intimacy between the inferred numbers **6** & **1.409**
takes on a new dynamic when their *product* is determined, **8.454**,
because, when expressed in degrees, it has an exceedingly interesting
property. …
When I surveyed the formation, I found the latitude of its estimated
centre to be: **51.376° N**. And **8.454°** is that centre's
displacement from a line of latitude, **42.922° N**, which intersects
the cited meridian, **2.26° E**, at a point that is located alongside
Rennes-le-Château. Indeed, this point faces a site that I concluded,
years ago, is the solution to the area's *treasure enigma*. The
respective relationships are illustrated below:-
Fig. 18
I would add that barely a stone's throw from the defined point I had,
during the early morning of Nov' 21, 1999, a stunning meeting with five
individuals from another world [although they were clearly related to us
genitically] as I've divulged both in lectures and on the radio.
I'd obtained the details of this unique rendezvous - its date, time and
location - beforehand by deciphering a set of ostensibly
incomprehensible texts that had been appearing on the dining-room table
of a Reading family, after the mother, her son and her sister had
experienced an incident involving *lost time* at the start of their
Florida holiday. Apart from anything else, this process demonstrated
that the methodology I'd developed to unravel the often bizarre letter
sequences confronting me, based on my perception of *prime numbers*,
headed by **1**, is sound.** **And I employ that same methodology
today when I examine other creations of the described *table text
authors*: crop formations.
I know then, with absolute certainty, that the crop circle community,
and similar groups, are correct to believe that we are being contacted
by an extra-terrestrial intelligence, despite the disgraceful and
pathetic indifference to the subject that's shown by governments, and
many academics, all over the world. I would add that it is of interest
that, at Hackpen Hill this year, our ET friends tied their extraordinary
prediction, of the recent *nova* event, with the meridian that we
now know intersects what I believe to be the treasure chamber at
Rennes-le-Château, the very area they had chosen to meet three of the
people from Reading and myself.
I believe they want to say to humanity's inept and corrupt governments
that if the crop circles hold the solution to this massive historical
enigma then what other benefits do they harbour? And by putting the
site's location firmly in the public domain, at Milk Hill and Hackpen
Hill, they're helping to guarantee that any gold, jewels and precious
relics that are extricated from there are used to alleviate global
poverty and suffering and not to prop up a seriously flawed and
unsustainable financial system that's leading us all to disaster.
In the final part of this article I'll show that the Hackpen Hill
structures - inclusive of the one that had appeared on July 15 - provide
a series of links to the earth model I alluded to earlier. They also
embody relationships to the centre of Silbury Hill's summit that exhibit
clear links to their own structural forms, thereby elucidating other
matters of interest. And my analysis provides a remarkable confirmation
of one more of Red Collie's insights.
© Neil Hudson Newman MSc. [Construction Management] 11 October, 2013
Author of: *Les Sentiers des Dieux, Pathways of the Gods* [2000] |